Pass the security review without routing content to a third party.
Cloud inspection proxies are their own privacy exposure. Alesia's on-device boundary removes the trust dependency that kills security review.
Content, verdicts, and matching documents never leave the device. Only anonymized metadata crosses, enough to demonstrate control, not enough to create new exposure.
- Content never transmitted
- Auditable structural boundary
- Metadata-only reporting
- Works with your policy and DPA
- Self-hostable in your own environment
What actually crosses the device boundary
A cloud inspection proxy has to see your data in order to inspect it, that's the trust problem procurement teams flag first. Alesia's detection model runs on the device itself, so the prompt, the match, and the verdict are all computed locally. What reaches your organization's dashboard is a record: category, severity, timestamp, device, and whether the employee proceeded, never the text that triggered it. That's a structural boundary your security team can point to during a review, not just a policy promise on paper. Because the boundary is architectural rather than contractual, it holds even as your AI tool mix changes: adding a new model provider doesn't require renegotiating a data-handling agreement with Alesia, since Alesia was never in the data path to begin with.
Answering the security questionnaire
A prospective enterprise customer's security team asks how you prevent employee AI use from leaking their data during your engagement. Instead of describing a proxy contract and a data processing addendum with a third-party inspection vendor, you point to the architecture: detection happens on the device, nothing routes through Alesia's servers, and the audit log shows category and outcome, not content. That's usually a faster review than adding another vendor to the data flow diagram. The reviewer typically asks one follow-up question, what happens to the metadata after it's collected, and a straight answer about retention windows and deletion on cancellation usually closes the topic in the same meeting.
What changes for your team
Compliance stops depending on trusting a third party with your data to prove you're protecting it. None of this requires a new contract with Alesia every time your AI tool mix changes, and it holds up the same way whether your reviewer is an internal security team or an external auditor. It's also easier to explain in plain language than a data-processing chain that runs through a third party's infrastructure.
- No new third party ever sees your employees' prompts
- Audit logs show outcomes, not content
- Works alongside your existing DPA and retention policy
- One less vendor to add to your data flow diagram
Bring every AI tool your company uses under one policy.
Talk to our team. We'll scope a rollout for your organization, without compromising the privacy boundary.